Case 3326446/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A McGinn v Cambridge Dental Hub Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3326446/2019
- Decision date
- 10 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrew Clarke
- Venue
- Watford via CVP
- Panel members
- Ms Jacqueline Beard, Mr Michael Kaltz
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A McGinn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs A McGinn began work for Cambridge Dental Hub Limited as a dental receptionist on 12 March 2019 and resigned in September 2019 while pregnant and suffering severe morning sickness. She presented a claim in December 2019 including unfair dismissal and pregnancy-related discrimination. The tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal claim was not allowed to proceed because she did not have the required two years' qualifying service and the claim was not one that disapplied that requirement.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim did not proceed because the claimant lacked two years' qualifying service and no exception disapplying that requirement applied. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal dismissed all pleaded s.18 Equality Act 2010 complaints, finding that any unfavourable treatment was not because of pregnancy. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.18 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.