Case 3326453/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Patel v Hundred Degrees (UK) Limited Heard : By CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 3326453/2019
- Decision date
- 4 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Patel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Miss D Patel's claim for unpaid wages was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it was not being actively pursued. The reasons note that by letter dated 21 March 2020 the claimant was asked to explain how she calculated the sum claimed, but she did not reply.
The tribunal then chased her by letter dated 15 May 2020 and required a response by 25 May 2020, but no reply was received. The claimant also did not attend the hearing on 4 February 2021 and no communication was received to explain her absence. No merits finding or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it was not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.