Case 3327048/2017 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Not present or represented — 2018
- Case reference
- 3327048/2017
- Decision date
- 25 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Palmer QC
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages. It found that wages were due for the period between November 2016 and July 2017 and awarded £2,349.60 for that claim.
The Tribunal also upheld the claimant's claim for two weeks' notice pay and awarded £692. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a total of £3,041.60.
The written record included an order stating that, if the claimant wished to pursue a claim for automatically unfair dismissal, she had to write to the Tribunal within 14 days setting out why she had such a claim. The judgment did not determine an unfair dismissal claim in the written record supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim upheld for wages due between November 2016 and July 2017. | Upheld | — | £2,350 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Judgment describes this as a claim for notice pay of two weeks. It does not provide further reasons beyond the oral judgment. | Upheld | — | £692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,042
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.