Case 3327110/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C. Fifield v Nestlé Purina Petcare (UK) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3327110/2019
- Decision date
- 30 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C. Fifield
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C. Fifield brought a claim for unfair (constructive) dismissal against Nestlé Purina Petcare (UK) Limited. The case was heard remotely by CVP at Watford on 28 and 29 October 2020 before Employment Judge McNeill QC sitting alone.
The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for unfair (constructive) dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. The written record does not set out the tribunal’s full reasoning; it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no separate remedy figures are set out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not provided in the record unless requested within 14 days. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.