Case 3327114/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Collett v Furl — 2020
- Case reference
- 3327114/2019
- Decision date
- 16 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Collett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out the claim. The reasons recorded that by letter dated 18 September 2020 the Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because he had failed to answer the Tribunal's letter of 16 May 2020.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge R Lewis ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying claim and no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not state the underlying cause of action; the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to answer the Tribunal's letter of 16 May 2020 and did not make sufficient representations in response to the later letter dated 18 September 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.