Case 3327126/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Elijah Muraya v Mr Joseph Karonjo — 2021
- Case reference
- 3327126/2019
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Elijah Muraya
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal Hearing Centre on 6 July 2021 before Employment Judge Tobin sitting alone. The hearing was remote by video, and the claimant was represented by Mr F Molloy of the FRU while the respondent appeared in person.
The written judgment states that, after hearing the claimant and allowing him to be questioned by the respondent, judgment was given in favour of the claimant for the amount claimed in his schedule of loss. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,165.29 gross.
The extracted judgment text does not identify the legal label of the claim or set out separate findings on liability beyond the award in the claimant's favour. It also records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written record does not specify the legal cause of action. It records that judgment was given in favour of the claimant for the amount claimed in his schedule of loss, and orders payment of £2,165.29 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,165 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,165
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.