Case 3327150/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Clarke v The Crown Estate — 2021
- Case reference
- 3327150/2019
- Decision date
- 5 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Clarke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading by CVP on 5 July 2021 before Employment Judge Anstis sitting alone. Mr S Clarke appeared in person and The Crown Estate was represented by counsel. The written judgment states that the claimant's claim is dismissed.
The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No separate findings or monetary award are set out in the written record; the gov.uk listing categorises the matter as involving breach of contract and disability discrimination.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claim is dismissed and does not set out separate reasoning for this head of claim. The gov.uk listing for the case identifies breach of contract as one of the claim categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claim is dismissed and does not set out separate reasoning for this head of claim. The gov.uk listing for the case identifies disability discrimination as one of the claim categories. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.