Case 3327200/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Peter Deady, Director — 2020
- Case reference
- 3327200/2019
- Decision date
- 10 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hyams sat alone at Watford by CVP on 18 November 2020. The claimant, Mr P Mircea, was employed by Valle Inn’s Limited at the material time. The tribunal found that his claim for unpaid wages in the sum of £500 before deduction of income tax and national insurance contributions was well-founded and succeeded.
No discrimination, dismissal, or other substantive employment claims are recorded in the judgment text provided. The judgment does not set out any additional reasoning beyond the conclusion that the unpaid wages claim succeeded, and it does not record any separate apportionment of the award or any interest element.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages in the sum of £500 before deduction of income tax and national insurance contributions was well-founded and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.