Case 3327223/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Rosciano v Araceli’s Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3327223/2019
- Decision date
- 2 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Rosciano
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anstis sat alone at Reading by CVP on 2 September 2020. The claimant, Mr M Rosciano, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend or provide representation. The tribunal amended the respondent's name to Araceli’s Limited.
The only substantive finding recorded in the judgment was that the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay to the claimant. The tribunal therefore upheld the holiday pay claim and ordered the respondent to pay £790 to the claimant as unpaid holiday pay. No separate breakdown for other heads of award is given in the written judgment.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No further findings, legal tests, or additional claims are recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal amended the respondent's name to Araceli’s Limited and found that it had failed to pay holiday pay to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £790 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £790
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.