Case 3327242/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Richardson in person v Not present or represented — 2021
- Case reference
- 3327242/2019
- Decision date
- 9 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Street Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Richardson in person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that the Claimant's complaint was well founded. It ordered the Respondent to pay £460 for holiday pay accrued and due on termination of employment, pursuant to the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant was employed from 29 May 2019 to 16 November 2019, worked an average of 20.75 hours over 5 days per week, and was entitled to £8.21 per hour. On that basis, it calculated 56.03 hours of holiday entitlement, producing £460 due in lieu of holiday.
The Tribunal also found that the Respondent had throughout been in breach of the duty to provide written particulars of employment. Applying section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, it considered it just and equitable to award the higher amount of four weeks' pay, calculated from weekly pay of £170.35, giving £681.40. The Tribunal stated that payslips provided for the hearing were fictitious and did not reflect payments made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal found holiday pay accrued due on termination and awarded payment in lieu pursuant to the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £460 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars; awarded under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The judgment also records breach of the obligation to provide accurate, itemised pay statements, but the stated monetary award is for written particulars. | Upheld | — | £681 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,141
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.