Case 3327262/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Ivanov Mrs M Andonova v Beclean Abingdon Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3327262/2019
- Decision date
- 6 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Ivanov Mrs M Andonova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThese linked proceedings, under case numbers 3327262/2019 and 3327263/2019 against Beclean Abingdon Ltd, came before Employment Judge Anstis at Reading on 6 November 2023. Neither claimant attended and neither party was represented at the hearing. The tribunal recorded that no witness statements or other evidence had been submitted by either side, and that the claims had already had a difficult procedural history, including an abortive earlier final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The reasons do not set out the underlying statutory basis; classified from the case listing category. Dismissed under rule 47 after the claimants did not attend and filed no evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The reasons do not identify the precise legal basis; this is classified as the written pay statement issue reflected in the listing. Dismissed under rule 47 after the claimants did not attend and filed no evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.