Case 3327477/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Brook v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3327477/2019
- Decision date
- 27 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss T Brook
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response to the claim, and judgment was entered for the claimant, Miss T Brook, under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records awards for unpaid holiday pay, unpaid wages, and notice pay against ExpertLife aka Smart:Money:Online.
The tribunal awarded £136.67 for holiday pay, £616.67 for unpaid wages for September 2019, £1,093.33 for unpaid wages for October 2019, and £1,366.67 for notice pay. The total award was £3,213.34, ordered to be paid to the claimant. No further findings or reductions are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Awarded as holiday pay compensation. | Upheld | — | £137 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded for unpaid wages: £616.67 for September 2019 and £1,093.33 for October 2019. | Upheld | — | £1,710 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as notice pay compensation; no further breakdown given. | Upheld | — | £1,367 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,213
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,213
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.