Case 3327495/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Miss PE Warman T/a The Victoria — 2021
- Case reference
- 3327495/2019
- Decision date
- 23 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was conducted remotely by CVP at Cambridge on 18 February 2021 before Employment Judge Ord. The written record identifies the respondent as Miss PE Warman, trading as The Victoria, and records that the claimants appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The judgment states that the claimants' complaints were not well founded and that the claims were dismissed. The record does not set out separate findings for each pleaded issue in the short written decision, and it does not record any monetary award.
The written record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further substantive findings are included in the supplied text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written record does not break out separate findings by cause of action; the overall judgment dismisses the claims in case numbers 3327495/2019 and 3327497/2019. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written record does not identify any separate remedy or separate outcome for this category; the tribunal dismissed the complaints as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.