Case 3327510/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F De Souza v Welch & Tidy Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3327510/2019
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daniels
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F De Souza
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 8 February 2021 before Employment Judge Daniels sitting alone, the tribunal struck out Ms F De Souza's unfair dismissal claim by consent. The reason recorded was that she did not have sufficient service to bring an unfair dismissal claim.
The tribunal also dealt with the monetary claims for unpaid wages and unpaid notice pay. It recorded that those sums had been paid by Welch & Tidy Ltd and that the claimant withdrew the claims at the hearing, after which they were dismissed. The judgment notes that no other claims had been brought and that the proceedings were at an end.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out by consent because the claimant did not have sufficient service to claim unfair dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claims for unpaid wages and unpaid notice pay; these sums had been paid by the respondent and the claimant withdrew them at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.