Case 3327622/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Gutteridge v Bp Shopping Express — 2020
- Case reference
- 3327622/2019
- Decision date
- 6 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Gutteridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 default judgment. The tribunal recorded that no response to the claimant’s claim had been submitted.
The tribunal found that the claimant was unlawfully dismissed. It also found that the claimant was the victim of discrimination on the protected characteristic of disability, as set out in the claim.
The judgment did not determine remedy. It states that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be decided at a separate remedy hearing, to be listed by separate notice.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was 'unlawfully dismissed' and was issued under Rule 21 because no response to the claim was submitted. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant was the victim of discrimination on the protected characteristic of disability as set out in the claim. The specific discriminatory act is not further particularised in this default judgment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.