Case 3327664/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For v Ms K Reece, Employment Adviser — 2021
- Case reference
- 3327664/2019
- Decision date
- 12 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing at Watford Tribunal Centre on 23 February 2021 before Tribunal Judge Douse, sitting alone. The claimant, Mr D Parker, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms K Reece, Employment Adviser.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for failure to pay holiday pay was brought out of time and dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction. It reached the same conclusion on the claimant's claim for failure to pay commission, finding that claim was also brought out of time and therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
The written record notes that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties. The decision was sent on 12 March 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Dismissed at preliminary hearing because the claim for failure to pay holiday pay was brought out of time and the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed at preliminary hearing because the claim for failure to pay commission was brought out of time and the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.