Case 3327807/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Donald v Yusen Logistics (UK) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3327807/2019
- Decision date
- 9 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Donald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cambridge on 5 January 2021 before Employment Judge K J Palmer. The judgment dated 9 February 2021 records a consolidated case containing claims of direct disability discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and direct sex discrimination.
The tribunal dismissed all of those claims on withdrawal. The judgment contains no findings on liability, no reasons on the merits, and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination; the judgment states this claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination; the judgment states this claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments; the judgment states this claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination; the judgment states this claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.