Case 3327833/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3327833/2019
- Decision date
- 15 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bloom Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on 12 November 2021 to determine whether the claimant was disabled for Equality Act purposes during the relevant period, which the tribunal identified as 18 January 2017 to 19 December 2019. The claim form, presented on 19 December 2019, pleaded unfair dismissal and disability discrimination, including direct discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments and harassment.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence and the medical material that he had PTSD and recurrent depressive disorder arising from his experiences in the Bosnia conflict. It found that the impairment had a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities, including concentration, memory, communication, interaction with family and the public, social functioning, reading, cooking and managing finances. The tribunal relied in particular on the claimant's impact statement and medical evidence from Professor Hirsch, Dr Farrow, Dr Allen and Dr Bhandari.
Applying the Equality Act definition of disability, the tribunal held that the effects were long term because they had lasted for at least twelve months before January 2017 and continued through the material period, or were likely to do so. It therefore concluded that the claimant was disabled at the material time. As a result, the disability discrimination claims and the unfair dismissal claim were allowed to proceed to a substantive full hearing. No findings on liability for dismissal or discrimination, and no remedy, were determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person at the material time and directed that the disability discrimination claims proceed to a full hearing; no merits determination was made on the underlying discrimination allegations. | Other | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal directed that the unfair dismissal claim proceed to a full hearing; no merits determination or remedy was made in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 para 2(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- s.212(1) Equality Act 2020
- Tesco Stores Limited v Tennant (2020) IRLR 363
- All Answers Limited v W & R (2021) EWCA Civ 606
- Rooney v Leicester City Council UKEAT 0064/20 and UKEAT 0104/21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.