Case 3327834/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Claimant v Thomas Cook UK Travel Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) & others — 2022

Case reference: 3327834/2019
Decision date: 28 March 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ainscough REPRESENTATION

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

Thomas Cook UK Travel Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) & others

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a CVP hearing in Manchester on 25 March 2022 before Employment Judge Ainscough, the tribunal dealt with the three named claimants, Miss A Rule, Mrs J Gibbons and Mr S Harrison, and the corresponding Thomas Cook respondents. The written judgment records a separate declaration for each claimant that they worked at one establishment where the relevant respondent proposed to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within a period of 90 days for the purposes of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.

The written record does not set out any protective award sum or other monetary remedy. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the judgment is confined to the declarations recorded above. The judgment was dated 28 March 2022 and sent to the parties on the same date.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The tribunal declared that Miss A Rule worked at one establishment at which the first respondent proposed to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within a period of 90 days for the purposes of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.	Other	—	—
Other	The tribunal declared that Mrs J Gibbons worked at one establishment at which the second respondent proposed to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within a period of 90 days for the purposes of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.	Other	—	—
Other	The tribunal declared that Mr S Harrison worked at one establishment at which the third respondent proposed to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within a period of 90 days for the purposes of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.	Other	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.