Case 3327846/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Bennet (formerly Brockis) v Oxford Care Homes Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3327846/2019
- Decision date
- 1 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Bennet (formerly Brockis)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 1 August 2020, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why its response should not be struck out under Rule 37. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had not complied with the directions of Employment Judge McNeill QC dated 5 March 2020 and that the response had not been actively pursued.
The respondent then failed to make written representations and failed to comply with the orders of Employment Judge Hyams dated 1 August 2020, so the response was struck out. The judgment states that the respondent would remain entitled to notice of future hearings and decisions, but could participate in any hearing only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment strikes out the respondent's response under Rule 37 for non-compliance and lack of active pursuit. It does not determine the substantive claim on the merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.