Case 3327861/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D James v Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 3327861/2019
- Decision date
- 19 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms J Stewart, Mr D Palmer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D James
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D James brought a claim of disability discrimination against Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. The case was heard at Reading on 7 April 2022 and 8 April 2022 before Employment Judge Anstis, sitting with Ms J Stewart and Mr D Palmer.
The written judgment records only the outcome: the claimant's disability discrimination claim was dismissed. The record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing.
No written reasons were provided in the public record, so the extracted text does not set out the tribunal's factual findings, the issues it resolved, or any remedy assessment. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records only that the claimant's claim of disability discrimination was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the written record. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.