Case 3327875/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Whybrow v Cre8 Futures Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3327875/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Whybrow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Postle found that Cre8 Futures Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs B Whybrow's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,724.00.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £432.00. The judgment records no discrimination issues, no separate interest award, and no other remedy beyond the two sums ordered.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,724.00. | Upheld | — | £1,724 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of damages of £432.00. | Upheld | — | £432 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,156
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.