Case 3327953/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Krawiec v Thomas Cook Group UK Travel Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3327953/2019
- Decision date
- 25 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss J Krawiec
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued judgment under rule 21 because the first respondent had not presented a response, the Secretary of State had made legal submissions, and the Official Receiver confirmed that the first respondent would not contest the protective award claim. The first respondent was in compulsory liquidation, and High Court permission had been granted for the claim to proceed.
The Tribunal found that the first respondent employed over 20 employees at Peterborough Westpoint and that the claimant was neither a member of a recognised trade union nor part of the bargaining unit there. The first respondent went into compulsory liquidation on 23 September 2019, the Official Receiver was appointed at 1:47am, and the claimant was notified that her employment was terminated with immediate effect.
The Tribunal found that there was no proper warning, notice, or consultation with recognised trade unions or with the claimant, and that no employee representatives had been elected or appointed for consultation under section 188A. It held that the first respondent was in breach of section 188 of the 1992 Act and made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 23 September 2019, subject to the recoupment regulations.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment upheld a complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with collective consultation requirements under section 188. The award was stated as 90 days' remuneration from 23 September 2019, but no monetary amount was specified. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.