Case 3327979/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Egan (Counsel) For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3327979/2019
- Decision date
- 19 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bloom Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms I Egan (Counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Reading by CVP on 16 July 2021, Employment Judge Bloom dealt with claims by Miss J Ellinor against Nirvana Spa and Leisure Limited for constructive unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. The claimant’s effective date of termination was 2 November 2018, and she presented her ET1 on 23 December 2019. The tribunal recorded that the claims were out of time and that the dispute turned on compliance with the early conciliation requirements.
The claimant had started ACAS early conciliation on 11 December 2018 and obtained certificate R353614/18/47 dated 11 January 2019. No claim was then presented within the statutory period. She later obtained a second early conciliation certificate, R149064/19/31, on 26 April 2019, but the ET1 referred to that second certificate rather than the first. The tribunal found that Rule 12(1)(c) of the 2013 Rules had therefore not been complied with.
Relying on Eon Control Solutions Limited v Caspall, the tribunal held that rejection under Rule 12 was mandatory and that it had no discretion to consider whether it was not reasonably practicable to present the constructive unfair dismissal claim in time or whether it was just and equitable to extend time for the discrimination claim. It therefore rejected both claims and said the claimant could consider an application for reconsideration under Rule 13(2) if the defect could be rectified.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Rejected pursuant to Rule 12(1)(c) and (2) because the ET1 relied on the second ACAS early conciliation certificate (R149064/19/31) rather than the first certificate (R353614/18/47). The tribunal said the defect meant it had no discretion to consider time-extension or amendment issues. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Rejected pursuant to Rule 12(1)(c) and (2) for the same early conciliation certificate defect. No merits findings or time-extension findings were made. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 12(1)(c) and (2) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Eon Control Solutions Limited v Caspall UKEAT/0003/19/JOJ
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.