Case 3328221/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A M Czupa v Bouygues E & S FM UK Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3328221/2017
- Decision date
- 8 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A M Czupa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 31 August 2019, the Tribunal gave Ms Czupa an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment records no merits determination on the underlying dispute and no monetary remedy or award.
The judgment also notes that a preliminary hearing fixed for 8 October 2019 would proceed in relation to claims against the other respondents, except for the claim against Carillion PLC, which was stayed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out 'the claim' under rule 37 because the claimant did not make sufficient representations after the 31 August 2019 letter. The extracted text does not specify the underlying substantive causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.