Case 3328227/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Khatun — 2020
- Case reference
- 3328227/2019
- Decision date
- 3 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment for this case is brief and records only that, for the reasons given orally to the parties, the claim was dismissed. It does not set out the tribunal's factual findings or legal analysis in writing.
The hearing took place at Watford on 3 December 2020 before Employment Judge Cowen, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Ms Khatun. The judgment was sent to the parties on 25 January 2021, and the record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
On the basis of the GOV.UK listing for the case, the claim is treated as one for unlawful deduction from wages, but the judgment itself does not give a written breakdown of the claim or any monetary award. The only recorded outcome is dismissal of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record does not set out the underlying factual issue or reasoning; it only records that the claim was dismissed for the oral reasons given at the hearing. The GOV.UK listing categorises the case as unlawful deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.