Case 3328237/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Markland v KMI Logistics Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3328237/2019
- Decision date
- 15 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Markland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr B Markland's claim against KMI Logistics was dismissed at a hearing in Reading on 15 February 2021. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto recorded that this was the second occasion on which the claimant had failed to attend for the hearing of the claim.
The respondent was represented by its director, Mr Carlos Hopffer. He told the tribunal that the claimant had been paid all sums due from the respondent and that, since payment was made, the claimant had not challenged the amount paid or suggested that he had not been paid correctly. The respondent's position was that there was no basis for the claim.
Having considered the information presented, the tribunal decided to dismiss the claim. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any separate remedy findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not restate the pleaded legal label, but the gov.uk listing for this case classifies it as Unlawful Deduction from Wages. The claim was dismissed after the claimant did not attend the hearing; the respondent said all sums due had been paid. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.