Case 3328241/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Venter v Minster Software Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3328241/2019
- Decision date
- 5 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Venter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place on 5 October 2020 at Reading by CVP before Employment Judge Anstis sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr P Clarke.
The written record states only that the claimant's claims were dismissed. The note on the judgment says that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days, so the published record does not include the tribunal's detailed findings or legal analysis.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment record does not set out any separate reasons or findings for this claim; it states only that the claimant's claims were dismissed. Claim type taken from the case listing context. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The written judgment record does not set out any separate reasons or findings for this claim; it states only that the claimant's claims were dismissed. Claim type taken from the case listing context. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.