Mr A Collins-Oshinusi v NSL Limited — 2020

Case reference: 3328354/2019
Decision date: 21 August 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hawksworth

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Collins-Oshinusi

Respondent

NSL Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal decided it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's unfair dismissal and breach of contract complaints because both were presented outside the applicable time limit.

It further found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented those complaints within time. On that basis, the claims were not heard on their substantive merits.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint because it was presented outside the time limit and it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented it in time.	Other	—	—
Breach of contract	The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the breach of contract complaint because it was presented outside the time limit and it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented it in time.	Other	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.