Case 3328359/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Melekeowi in person For the v Miss S Bowen (C) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3328359/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mr F Wright, Ms S Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Melekeowi in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Reading, constituted by Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby with Mr F Wright and Ms S Hughes, heard the claimant’s claims against G4S Cash Solutions (UK) Limited on 28 February 2023 to 2 March 2023. The written judgment records that the claimant’s claims for race discrimination, wrongful deduction of wages, and victimisation were not well founded and were dismissed.
The judgment itself contains no further written findings on the facts or reasoning. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days, so the published record sets out only the dismissal outcome and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.