Case 3328553/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Riasat v Plastic Engineering Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3328553/2017
- Decision date
- 12 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M Riasat
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 21 September 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr M Riasat an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not contain any merits findings on the underlying breach of contract, disability discrimination, or unfair dismissal allegations, and it records no remedy because the matter was disposed of at the strike-out stage.
The decision was given by Employment Judge Anstis on 12 October 2023 and sent to the parties on 25 October 2023.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that 'the claim is struck out' because the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 21 September 2023. The judgment does not separate the outcome by underlying claim, so this entry records the strike-out as applying to the breach of contract claim within the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that 'the claim is struck out' because the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 21 September 2023. The judgment does not separate the outcome by underlying claim, so this entry records the strike-out as applying to the disability discrimination claim within the case listing. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that 'the claim is struck out' because the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 21 September 2023. The judgment does not separate the outcome by underlying claim, so this entry records the strike-out as applying to the unfair dismissal claim within the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.