Case 3328767/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N McIntyre v Keyline Chartered Security (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3328767/2017
- Decision date
- 14 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N McIntyre
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss N McIntyre was employed by Keyline Chartered Security (In Administration) as a security officer at the Royal Berkshire Hospital from 1 August 2016 until 11 October 2017. The tribunal accepted her evidence that she had been moved to another location under protest, accused of sleeping on duty, and then dismissed for gross misconduct without notice. The tribunal was satisfied that she was not sleeping on duty and that there was no other basis for concluding that she had been guilty of gross misconduct.
On that basis, the tribunal held that there were no grounds for terminating the employment without notice and found that she had been wrongfully dismissed. By reference to section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, it held that she was entitled to one week's notice pay, calculated on a gross weekly wage of £406.08, and ordered that sum to be paid as damages for breach of contract.
The tribunal also found that two days' wages, totalling £203.04 gross, had been unpaid at the date of dismissal and remained outstanding. It ordered payment of that sum as an unauthorised deduction from wages, noting that the amount stated was gross and that payment of the net amount would satisfy the judgment debt if the respondent paid any tax and national insurance due to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was not sleeping on duty, there were no grounds for gross misconduct, and there were no grounds for terminating her employment without notice. The award was described as notice pay and damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £406 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found two days' pay, amounting to £203.04 gross, had not been paid at the date of dismissal and remained outstanding. The judgment notes that if the respondent pays any tax and national insurance due to HMRC, payment of the net amount will meet the judgment debt. | Upheld | — | £203 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £609
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.