Case 3328907/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Hanif v Singhar Beauty — 2019
- Case reference
- 3328907/2017
- Decision date
- 25 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Hanif
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a strike out judgment under rule 37. By a letter dated 25 May 2019, it gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claims should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, within the time stipulated. On that basis, Employment Judge Henry struck out the claims. The judgment does not set out any findings on the underlying merits of the dispute.
The extracted text does not identify the substantive causes of action in the body of the judgment, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because the claimant failed to make written representations, or sufficient representations, within the time stipulated after a letter dated 25 May 2019. The text does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.