Case 3328979/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Murday v RMS Staffing Services Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3328979/2017
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Murday
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ord entered judgment on 16 January 2019 under rule 52 after the claimant withdrew the claim. The judgment records that the proceedings are dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant against the third respondent.
No findings of fact, liability, or remedy are set out in the extracted text. The only substantive disposition is that the case ended because of withdrawal, and the judgment does not record any monetary award.
The extracted text refers to the 'third respondent', although the case caption names RMS Staffing Services Limited as respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a rule 52 withdrawal judgment. It states that the proceedings are dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant against the third respondent; no substantive liability findings are recorded. The text refers to the 'third respondent' although the caption names RMS Staffing Services Limited as respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.