Case 3329000/2017 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Moghadam Mehnoush T/a Sizzler Express Pizza — 2019
- Case reference
- 3329000/2017
- Decision date
- 18 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford on 18 December 2019, Employment Judge Bedeau dealt with remedy in Mr E Rahimi’s claim against Mr Moghadam Mehnoush t/a Sizzler Express Pizza. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal declared that there had been unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £582 gross in respect of 77.6 hours unpaid work. The judgment states that the claimant was to account for any income tax and/or national insurance deductions due from that sum.
The tribunal also made a Preparation Time Order in the claimant’s favour for £350. The judgment records the total payable by the respondent as £932.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that there had been unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £582 gross for 77.6 hours unpaid. The claimant was to account for any income tax and/or national insurance due on that sum. | Upheld | — | £582 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £932
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.