Case 3329057/2017 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3329057/2017
- Decision date
- 16 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Palmer Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim and ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £5,379.00, a compensatory award of £2,430.00 net, and £400.00 for loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay notice pay of £5,386.26 net. The written judgment records the outcome and remedy only; it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment expressly upheld unfair dismissal and awarded a basic award of £5,379.00, a compensatory award of £2,430.00 (net), and £400.00 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £8,209 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment awarded notice pay of £5,386.26 (net). This is treated as the contractual claim listed on the gov.uk record. | Upheld | — | £5,386 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,595
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,379
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,830
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.