Case 3329223/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Duller, lay representative v Respondent — 2017
- Case reference
- 3329223/2017
- Decision date
- 29 September 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr E Duller, lay representative
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs C Fell brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Bellerby’s Educational Services Limited. Employment Judge Vowles, sitting alone, heard the case at Reading on 4 and 5 December 2019. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 29 September 2017, which was the effective date of termination.
Applying section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal found that the dismissal was not unfair. The unfair dismissal complaint therefore failed and was dismissed.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the judgment notes that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that Mrs C Fell was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 29 September 2017 and that the dismissal was not unfair. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.