Case 3329420/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Sinnamon v Carexl Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3329420/2017
- Decision date
- 17 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Sinnamon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bury St Edmunds hearing on 15 and 16 April 2019, Employment Judge M Warren recorded that Ms J Sinnamon’s claims for unfair dismissal, breach of contract (notice pay), pregnancy related discrimination, and holiday pay succeeded. The written judgment does not set out detailed findings of fact or legal analysis; it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons were provided in the published record.
The tribunal awarded a total of £15,825.57. That figure included a basic award of £865.38 for unfair dismissal, £865.38 for notice pay as breach of contract, £616.51 for accrued untaken holiday pay, and £7,478.30 for loss of earnings under the Equality Act 2010 in relation to the pregnancy related discrimination claim.
The discrimination award also included £6,000 for injury to feelings. The record does not divide the compensation into any further sub-findings beyond the monetary breakdown, so the published judgment is limited to the outcomes and remedy figures rather than a detailed explanation of how each head of loss was assessed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £865 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was expressly identified as the breach of contract element of the award. | Upheld | — | £865 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The award was split between loss of earnings under the Equality Act 2010 (£7,478.30) and injury to feelings (£6,000). | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £13,478 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued untaken holiday pay in the holiday year to the date of dismissal. | Upheld | — | £617 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,826
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £865
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,478
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.