Case 3329501/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Jenkinson v Optimus Pub Co. Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3329501/2017
- Decision date
- 29 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Palmer JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Jenkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment in the case of Mr W Jenkinson v Optimus Pub Co. Ltd. The judgment states that the claimant's claim was struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. No substantive findings on liability, facts, or remedy are set out in the extracted text.
The available text does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim, but the case was listed by GOV.UK as an unlawful deduction from wages matter, so the extracted claim is classified on that basis. The judgment gives no further reasoning beyond the strike-out order.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text. The only operative outcome stated is that the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the claimant's claim was struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. No substantive merits findings are given. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.