Case 3330751/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Sandra McAllister v Crown Cleaning Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3330751/2018
- Decision date
- 8 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Sandra McAllister
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Michell heard the case at Cambridge on 18 October 2019. The claimant, Sandra McAllister, appeared in person. The respondent, Crown Cleaning Group Ltd, did not appear and was not represented.
The tribunal amended the respondent's name to Crown Cleaning Group Ltd and found that the claimant's complaint that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from her wages during the period 1 to 29 March 2018 was well founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £379.50. The judgment explains that this figure was calculated as 23 days multiplied by 2 hours per day at £8.25 per hour, and the order was made pursuant to s.24(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages during 1 to 29 March 2018 well founded and ordered payment of £379.50, calculated as 23 days x 2 hours per day at £8.25 per hour. | Upheld | — | £380 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £380
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.