Case 3330823/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v Ms T Hudson, Solicitor — 2019
- Case reference
- 3330823/2018
- Decision date
- 6 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was listed to consider strike out and a deposit order. The claimant did not attend. After considering the claim form, Employment Judge Bedeau recorded that the tribunal was satisfied the claimant had absented herself without good cause, and all claims arising out of case 3330823/2018 were dismissed.
The judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying allegations. It also made case management orders about costs: the respondent was directed to submit a costs application and schedule by 23 May 2019, and the claimant was directed to provide a statement of means and monthly expenses by 6 June 2019. The judge stated that, subject to the claimant's views, the costs application was proposed to be dealt with on the papers without a public hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written reasons do not identify the individual claim types in the extracted text; the judgment dismisses all claims in case 3330823/2018 after the claimant failed to attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.