Case 3330919/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Njie v Universal Care Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3330919/2018
- Decision date
- 22 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daniels
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Njie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Daniels sitting alone on 7 February 2019. The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. It held that Ms Njie did not have two years' continuous service, was not an employee within s230 ERA 1996, and had presented the claim out of time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it.
The tribunal also held that Ms Njie was not employed under a contract of employment within s230 EWRA 1996, but was a worker within s230 ERA 1996. On that basis, it found that it had no jurisdiction to hear the breach of contract claim because she was not an employee and/or because that claim was out of time.
The judgment then listed issues that might fall to be determined at a later case management hearing, including limitation for the Equality Act complaints, whether the claimant was disabled because of visual impairment and/or sickle cell, direct discrimination because of race, religion, age or disability, harassment related to race and/or religion, and unauthorised deductions from wages. The judgment did not determine those merits issues at this stage, and listed a further case management hearing for 1 May 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed at preliminary hearing for lack of jurisdiction: the claimant did not have two years' continuous service, was not an employee within s230 ERA 1996, and the claim was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the claimant was not an employee within s230 ERA 1996 and/or the claim was out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s230 ERA 1996 employee/worker distinction
- s230 EWRA 1996 contract of employment
- s123 Equality Act 2010 time limits
- ss23(2)-(4) ERA 1996 time limits
- s48(3)(a)-(b) ERA 1996 time limits
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.