Case 3330960/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mr Y Wang and Ms S Zhu T/a Forever Beauty — 2020
- Case reference
- 3330960/2018
- Decision date
- 20 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mrs A E Brown, Ms H T Edwards
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant, Mrs J Barrett, was employed by the second respondent, Shuzen Zhu, and that the claims against the first respondent, Ya Wang, were dismissed. The hearing took place at Reading on 20 July 2020 before Employment Judge Anstis with lay members Mrs A E Brown and Ms H T Edwards.
The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim against the second respondent. However, it recorded that no award of compensation was made for that unfair dismissal.
The tribunal also upheld the wrongful dismissal claim. It found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract and ordered the second respondent to pay £1,068.60, comprising £356.20 for notice pay and £712.40 as an increase under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.
The claimant's claims of sex discrimination, pregnancy or maternity discrimination, and/or victimisation were dismissed. No further remedy was awarded on those claims.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the second respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant, but no award of compensation was made for that dismissal. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract and awarded £1,068.60, made up of £356.20 for notice pay and £712.40 as an increase under s38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,069 |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claimant's sex discrimination claim together with the pregnancy or maternity discrimination and/or victimisation claims. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claimant's pregnancy or maternity discrimination claim together with the sex discrimination and/or victimisation claims. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment dismisses the claimant's victimisation claim together with the sex and pregnancy or maternity discrimination claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,069
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.