Case 3331015/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Ottenburger v RTS Textile Recyclers — 2021
- Case reference
- 3331015/2018
- Decision date
- 5 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Ottenburger
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 May 2021, the tribunal gave Mr R Ottenburger an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why his claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that administrator's consent had not been obtained, the company to which he had transferred no longer existed, and the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Ottenburger did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive merits finding or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 14 May 2021 to make representations or request a hearing. The stated reasons were that administrator's consent had not been obtained, the company to which the claimant had transferred no longer existed, and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.