Case 3331052/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Lewandowska Mr D Cockroft v Distribution Centre Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331052/2018
- Decision date
- 14 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Lewandowska Mr D Cockroft
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 16 June 2019, the tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claims should not be struck out. The stated bases were that the claimants had not complied with the tribunal's orders dated 25 January 2019 and that the claims had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, or did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claims under rule 37. The hearing listed for 12 to 14 August 2019 did not take place, and no substantive merits or remedy findings were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The strike-out judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause(s) of action; it records only that "the claims" were struck out under rule 37 after the claimants failed to comply with tribunal orders dated 25 January 2019 and did not actively pursue the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.