Case 3331160/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Norris (HR Professional) v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331160/2018
- Decision date
- 27 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr I Bone, Mr D Bean
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms H Norris (HR Professional)
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Watford before Employment Judge Smail with lay members Mr I Bone and Mr D Bean, disposed of four claims brought by Mrs S Harrison against Lapp Ltd. The claim for unfair dismissal was dismissed. The claim for equal pay was also dismissed.
The judgment also records claims of direct sex discrimination and unauthorised deductions from earnings as dismissed upon withdrawal. No remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment, and no further findings are set out in the extracted text beyond the outcome of each claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Equal pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records these claims as 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records these claims as 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.