Case 3331177/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss I Anghel v Rico Logistics and and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3331177/2018
- Decision date
- 13 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss I Anghel
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss I Anghel's claim. The reasons given were that the claim had not been actively pursued and that the claimant had failed to comply with tribunal orders made at a hearing on 19 May 2020, at which she was present and represented. The tribunal also recorded that the claimant did not attend the hearing on 13 January 2021 and gave no explanation for her absence.
No merits findings were made. The judgment does not record any award or remedy, and it does not contain reasons resolving the substantive discrimination allegations. The only outcome recorded is strike out of the claim on procedural grounds.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying pleaded claim type, but the case listing/category identifies race discrimination. The judgment records only that the claim was struck out for non-pursuit and non-compliance with orders. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.