Case 3331210/2018 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance or v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331210/2018
- Decision date
- 7 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
No attendance or
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal substituted C & A Arhitectural Limited as the First Respondent and joined CAA Installation Limited as the Second Respondent.
The tribunal found the First Claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from earnings well-founded against the First Respondent, awarding £1,030 for unpaid earnings during March to April 2018. It also found the Second Claimant's claims for unauthorised deductions from earnings well-founded against both respondents, awarding £1,100 against the First Respondent for March to April 2018 and £2,196 against the Second Respondent for 11 February 2019 to 7 March 2019.
The judgment ordered all amounts to be paid within seven days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found unauthorised deductions from earnings well-founded. Awards were split as £1,030 to the First Claimant against the First Respondent, £1,100 to the Second Claimant against the First Respondent, and £2,196 to the Second Claimant against the Second Respondent. | Upheld | — | £4,326 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,326
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.