Case 3331238/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Swift v Evolution Sports Trading Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3331238/2018
- Decision date
- 16 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Swift
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place remotely by CVP on 1 April 2021 before Employment Judge Alliott, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance for the respondent. The tribunal recorded that Evolution Sports Trading Limited was dissolved on 23 January 2021.
The claim was struck out because there was no legal entity against which an order could be made. The tribunal also noted that the claimant had not applied for a stay to enable an application to restore the respondent to the register, and it made no substantive findings on the underlying claims or any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal did not determine the substantive claims because the respondent had been dissolved on 23 January 2021. It struck out the claim because there was no legal entity against which an order could be made, and the claimant had not applied for a stay to seek restoration of the respondent to the register. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.