Case 3331445/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Veetasingam v Precious Healthcare Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3331445/2018
- Decision date
- 8 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Veetasingam
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 11 December 2020, the Tribunal gave Miss Veetasingam an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The Tribunal identified two bases for strike out: failure to comply with its order dated 29 October 2020 and failure to actively pursue the claim.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The judgment contains no substantive findings on the underlying merits of the pleaded claims and records no remedy, as the case was disposed of at the strike-out stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the underlying claim type on the merits. It records only that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 29 October 2020 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.